Search for: "Merck, Sharpe "
Results 1 - 20
of 267
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Oct 2020, 6:34 pm
Electron Microscope Image of Human BloodPhotographers: Bruce Wetzel and Harry SchaeferJane LambertPatents Court (Mr Justice Meade) Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd v Wyeth LLC [2020] EWHC 2636 (Pat) (15 Oct 2020) This was an action by Merck Sharp & Dohme Ltd ("MSD") for the revocation of European Patent (UK) 2,676,679 for formulations which stabilize and inhibit precipitation of immunogenic compositions [read post]
27 May 2019, 8:54 pm
Noonan -- Last week, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
3 Sep 2019, 9:01 pm
The Four Courts, Dublin Author Jtdirl Released into public domain by the copyright owner Source Wikipedia Supreme Court of Ireland Jane Lambert Irish Supreme Court (Chief Justice Clarke and Justices O'Donnel Donal, McKechnie, Dunne, O'Malley and Iseult) Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Clonmel Healthcare Ltd. [read post]
20 May 2019, 8:31 am
Today the Supreme Court handed down its decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
29 Nov 2011, 11:24 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme, one of the country’s largest pharmaceutical companies, has agreed to pay $950 million to settle both civil fraud allegations and criminal charges relating to the promotion of the painkiller Vioxx. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 9:49 pm
(and Judge Pauline Newman continues to disagree with her brethren in some regards) in a decision handed down last Friday, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 9:56 pm
By Donald Zuhn -- Today, in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2019, 7:58 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., decided earlier this month, and as a bonus, illustrated how including disclosure in a specification for completeness and expanded claim scope can result in an invalidated claim when that scope unnecessarily encompasses the prior art. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 8:12 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 10:33 am
American pharmaceutical company Merck, Sharp & Dohme (Merck) will pay $950 million to resolve criminal charges and civil claims related to its promotion and marketing of the painkiller Vioxx® (rofecoxib). [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 1:00 pm
[1] Complaint at 1-2, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
19 Apr 2012, 8:29 pm
Merck Sharp & Dohme, a unit of Merck & Co., pled guilty to one misdemeanor count of misbranding its painkiller drug Vioxx. [read post]
9 Apr 2011, 9:07 am
The IPKat has had his attention directed to the decision in Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Teva UK Ltd, [2011] EWCA Civ 382, a ruling of the Court of Appeal for England and Wales (Sir Andrew Morrit, The Chancellor of the High Court, providing a judgment with which Richards and Patten LJJ agreed) handed down yesterday.To summarise: Teva had applied for revocation of Merck’s European Patent (EP(UK) 0509752), relating to “ophthalmic compositions comprising… [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 8:08 am
Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp v Apotex Pty Ltd [2012] FCA 928 (31 August 2012) Interlocutory injunctions – prima facie case – balance of convenience – permanent impact of generic competition upon market for pharmaceutical products The Federal Court of Australia (Justice Jagot) has issued a preliminary injunction barring generic pharmaceutical manufacturer from marketing and selling nasal sprays containing the corticosteroid mometasone furoate (MF) for the… [read post]
31 May 2020, 3:37 pm
This time it was Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and Ors [2020] EWHC 1273 (Ch), regarding issues remitted by the Court of Appeal back in November 2017 [fun fact: also the month that Salvator Mundi became the most expensive painting ever sold, at a cool $450,312,500.]Quick recap: Merck KGgA (Merck Global) is a German company that traces its roots back to 1668. [read post]
13 May 2016, 4:12 am
€ 190 The post Sweden: Merck Sharp & Dohme v. [read post]
2 Nov 2017, 2:25 pm
” Circuit Judge Pauline Newman filed a dissenting opinion (Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. v. [read post]
24 Feb 2014, 11:19 am
By agreement, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD) was permitted to use the MERCK trade mark in the US and Canada, but its use in certain other territories was restricted. [read post]
21 Jan 2015, 5:30 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
